Editorial policy
How How to Astral Project distinguishes first-hand experience, evidence, interpretation and open questions.
Four kinds of statement, kept separate
- What I experienced
- Personal reports are valuable primary material, but they are not presented as universal proof.
- What others describe
- Patterns across testimony are treated as questions worth investigating, with sources and context where possible.
- What research supports
- Scientific statements are linked to primary research or strong reviews, and their limits are stated plainly.
- What might explain it
- Spiritual, neurological and philosophical interpretations remain labelled as interpretations.
How articles are prepared
Research and editorial tools may be used to organise notes, identify unanswered questions and improve structure. Rob remains responsible for the claims published under his name. First-hand statements must come from his own account, external claims should be checked against their sources, and automation is not treated as evidence.
Corrections and meaningful updates
Articles show publication and update dates. Substantive changes to evidence, safety advice or conclusions are recorded as editorial updates rather than silently rewritten.
Health and safety
This site is educational and experiential, not medical advice. Claims about sleep, mental health or neurological conditions are handled conservatively and should never replace advice from a qualified professional who knows the individual.